In the previous two installments of this series on the fiction of sexual violence, I reflected, first, on the
disabling dehumanization that is pictured in Toni Morrison's
Beloved. Next, I traced how sexual aggression creates
dysfunctional and disfigured relationships in William Faulkner's
Light in August. In this post, I want to make some initial soundings into one instance of potential sexual assault in J. M. Coetzee's
Disgrace.
This novel is the most complex of the three in its representations of sexual violence, and this is the reason I say "initial soundings." I cannot here say everything I would like to say -- and that the novel invites, and deserves, to be said.
And I say "potential sexual assault," because the brilliance of Coetzee's narrative is the way in which he adroitly, and realistically, captures the ambiguities that attend instances of alleged date rape on college campuses. Of course, David Lurie is Melanie Isaacs' professor, which adds moral entanglements to this coupling.
By focusing on a scene early in the story, I suggest that Coetzee narrates a fiction of sexual violence: one the one hand, a story about a questionable rape; on the other hand, the alleged assault also creates
deathly distance between the characters. The relationship between Lurie and Melanie is not a given; it is made. It is, in this sense, a fiction. Of what the relationship is made is precisely the question that carries through a major strain of the story's conflict.